QA/AI
Human-augmented quality assurance, engineered around five proprietary AI systems built in-house — because the market alternatives weren't good enough.
No licensing fees. No per-seat pricing. No vendor lock-in. When the engagement ends, the working systems we built for you stay yours.
| Engineers on-line | 50+ |
| Proprietary modules | 05 |
| Countries covered | 24+ |
| Years in operation | Since 2018 (VII yrs) |
| Clutch rating | 4.9 / 5.0 |
| Certification | NATO · ISO 27001 |
| Operational status | ● READY |
Five systems,
one toolchain.
Each module is a production system we built because existing tooling left gaps. All five are included at no additional cost with every engagement.
Screenshot a bug, get a documented report and regression test case in five minutes. AI extracts repro steps, expected vs actual, severity scoring, and pre-fills test coverage.
Record once, replay forever. Self-healing selectors: when your UI changes, Flows finds alternative locators automatically. Tests stay green without manual maintenance.
WCAG, GDPR, and EU AI Act audits with AI-drafted remediation. Not "contrast too low" — "change #777777 to #595959 on button.primary." Audit-ready reports.
Transparent time tracking cross-referenced with GitHub commits and Jira tickets. Proves the work happened, billed what's billable, and surfaces exactly where engineers spent their time.
Nine Claude-powered agents running SAST, SCA, DAST, secret scanning, and dependency analysis in parallel. Cross-pollination: when SAST finds an SQL-injection pattern, DAST focuses on those endpoints. Agents share context so findings compound instead of duplicating effort.
What the AI actually does.
Precise capabilities, named and scoped. AI handles repetition; humans handle judgment. We don't pretend otherwise.
| Flag | Description | Module | Time to result |
|---|---|---|---|
| --bug-to-test | Screenshot a bug; AI generates a documented report plus regression test cases. Five minutes from discovery to coverage. | BugBoard | ~5 min |
| --self-heal | When UI changes break selectors, AI finds alternatives automatically. Tests stay green without manual maintenance cycles. | Flows | realtime |
| --cross-pollinate | When SAST detects an SQL-injection pattern, DAST focuses on those endpoints. Agents share context across analysis layers. | AI Security | batch |
| --remediate | AI explains WCAG failures in plain English. Not "contrast too low" but "change #777 to #595959 on button.primary". | Auditi | ~2 min |
| --generate-tests | Describe a feature in natural language; receive comprehensive test cases covering happy paths, edge cases, and error states. | BugBoard | ~30 sec |
Four phases, one contract.
A bounded pilot before the long-term engagement. If the pilot doesn't demonstrate value, we adjust — no year-long contract to unwind.
Questions we always get.
Honest answers. No sales pitch, no vendor theatre.
Do I pay extra for the tools?
No. All five tools are included at no additional cost — no per-seat licensing, no vendor lock-in. When the engagement ends, you keep the automation and documentation we built during our time together.
Can AI replace my QA team?
No, and we'd walk away from a project that tried. AI handles repetition — regression, data generation, selector maintenance, triage. Humans handle judgment — risk assessment, exploratory testing, strategy. We've seen "AI replaced QA" projects fail enough times to be blunt about it.
How long until we see results?
Most pilots run two weeks: contained scope, measurable outcomes, clear go/no-go at the end. If the pilot doesn't demonstrate value, we adjust — no year-long contract to unwind and no awkward off-boarding.
What if Flows doesn't fit my app?
Flows is web-only. For mobile we use Maestro or Appium; for desktop, whatever framework fits. We're honest about tool limitations because pretending otherwise wastes everybody's time. The goal is coverage, not tool-evangelism.
Fifteen minutes,
one technical conversation.
We show you exactly how the five tools fit your workflow. What they cover, where they stop, and what a pilot would look like for your stack.
Need help with software testing?
BetterQA provides independent QA services with 50+ engineers across manual testing, automation, security audits, and performance testing.