How to evaluate offshore software testing partners
A framework for assessing security, communication, and quality when choosing offshore QA vendors
Offshore software testing promises cost savings, but the wrong partner can introduce security risks, communication breakdowns, and quality issues that far exceed any budget benefits. Recent incidents like Boeing’s $9/hour developers and Ukrainian anthem code in Russian voting software show what happens when vendor evaluation fails.
This guide provides a structured framework for evaluating offshore testing partners based on geographic risk, security compliance, communication infrastructure, and quality processes.
Understanding offshore, nearshore, and onshore testing
The terms “offshore,” “nearshore,” and “onshore” refer to the geographic and timezone distance between your company and your testing vendor. Each model has distinct tradeoffs in cost, communication, and risk.
For US companies, onshore means US-based vendors, nearshore typically means Mexico or Canada, and offshore means India, Southeast Asia, or Eastern Europe. For EU companies, onshore means same-country EU vendors, nearshore means other EU countries, and offshore means outside the EU.
Risk assessment framework
Evaluate offshore testing partners across four critical risk dimensions:
Assess the vendor’s ability to protect your intellectual property and sensitive data.
- ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certification
- Data residency policies (EU GDPR, US state laws)
- Employee background checks and NDA enforcement
- Network security (VPN, encrypted channels)
- Access control and audit logging
Consider the vendor’s location and the legal framework governing your relationship.
- Country stability and rule of law
- Export control and sanctions compliance
- Enforceability of contracts and NDAs
- Data sovereignty regulations
- Government surveillance and data access laws
Ensure the vendor can communicate effectively despite timezone and language barriers.
- Overlap hours with your team (minimum 4 hours)
- English proficiency (written and verbal)
- Collaboration tools (Slack, Jira, Zoom)
- Response time SLAs
- Escalation procedures for critical issues
Verify the vendor has mature QA processes and technical capabilities.
- Test management and defect tracking systems
- Test automation capabilities and frameworks
- Code review and peer testing practices
- Continuous integration and reporting
- Performance and security testing expertise
Communication and timezone considerations
Timezone differences create coordination challenges. A vendor in India (12 hours ahead of US Pacific time) means your morning standup happens at their midnight. Bug reports filed at 5pm your time get answered the next day.
Minimum requirements for effective communication
- At least 4 hours of daily overlap between your team and the vendor’s core hours
- Dedicated point of contact available during your business hours
- Async communication protocols (detailed bug reports, video updates, documentation)
- Weekly sync meetings during overlap hours
- Clear escalation path for urgent issues outside overlap hours
Nearshore vendors (1-3 hour difference) enable real-time collaboration. Offshore vendors (8-12 hour difference) require disciplined async workflows.
Language and cultural factors
Technical English proficiency matters less than you think. More important is the vendor’s understanding of your industry, user base, and quality standards. A vendor who has worked with similar products in your vertical will ask better questions and catch domain-specific bugs that a generic testing team misses.
Security and IP protection
Two high-profile incidents illustrate what can go wrong with offshore development and testing:
Boeing’s 737 MAX MCAS system, implicated in two fatal crashes, was partly developed by offshore contractors paid as little as $9 per hour. Engineers lacked proper training on aviation safety standards, and communication breakdowns between Boeing’s Seattle team and offshore developers in India led to critical software defects.
Source: Bloomberg, 2019In 2021, developers discovered that Rostec’s Russian election software contained embedded code that played Ukraine’s national anthem. The incident revealed that even sensitive government software was being outsourced to developers in neighboring countries, creating security and political risks.
Source: The Guardian, 2021Security checklist for offshore vendors
- ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II certification (verify audit reports)
- Background checks for all engineers with access to your code
- NDAs with liquidated damages clauses enforceable in your jurisdiction
- Mandatory VPN and 2FA for accessing your systems
- No USB drives, no personal devices in work areas
- Audit logs for all code access, data exports, and system changes
- Data residency guarantees (code and test data stay in EU/US)
- Right to audit clause in contract (unannounced inspections)
- Cyber insurance with minimum $2M coverage
- Incident response plan with <24 hour notification requirement
Why EU-based nearshore is the right balance
Nearshore vendors in the EU combine cost efficiency with lower risk. For US and EU companies, EU-based testing vendors offer:
We’re based in Romania, an EU and NATO member state with strong IP protection laws and GDPR compliance.
We’ve tested software for EU government agencies, NATO contractors, and US SaaS companies. Our location in Romania (EU/NATO member) means your code stays under EU data protection laws, enforceable contracts, and lower geopolitical risk than distant offshore vendors.
Evaluation checklist
Use this checklist when interviewing offshore testing vendors:
- Can you provide references from clients in our industry vertical?
- What is your team’s timezone? How many overlap hours with our core hours?
- What certifications do you hold? (ISO 27001, SOC 2, CMMI)
- Where is our code and test data stored? (country, data center location)
- Do you perform background checks on engineers? What level of screening?
- What tools do you use for test management, defect tracking, and reporting?
- How do you handle urgent issues outside overlap hours?
- What is your team’s attrition rate? How do you handle knowledge transfer?
- Can we audit your facilities and security practices?
- What is your incident response process for security breaches?
- Do you have cyber insurance? What coverage limits?
- How do you ensure consistent quality across different testers?
Red flags to watch for
Walk away if the vendor:
- Refuses to provide audit reports or certification details
- Cannot name specific engineers who will work on your project
- Uses generic, non-industry-specific testing examples in their portfolio
- Quotes significantly below market rates (often indicates bait-and-switch or quality issues)
- Insists on using their own servers for code storage (IP risk)
- Has high employee turnover (>30% annually)
- Cannot provide enforceable NDAs in your jurisdiction
- Vague about data residency or uses data centers in non-allied countries
- No incident response plan or <72 hour breach notification timelines
Frequently asked questions
Offshore testing typically refers to vendors in distant countries with 8-12 hour timezone differences (e.g., US companies using vendors in India or Southeast Asia). Nearshore testing uses vendors in adjacent countries or regions with smaller timezone gaps (1-3 hours) and similar cultural/legal frameworks. For US companies, nearshore means Mexico or Canada. For EU companies, nearshore means other EU countries.
Cost savings range from 30-75% depending on the vendor’s location. Nearshore EU vendors (Poland, Romania, Portugal) offer 40-60% savings vs US rates. Distant offshore vendors (India, Philippines) offer 60-75% savings but introduce higher communication and coordination overhead. Factor in hidden costs like timezone delays, rework from miscommunication, and security compliance.
At minimum, look for ISO 27001 (information security management) or SOC 2 Type II (service organization controls). For government or defense contractors, CMMI Level 3+ or equivalent process maturity certifications matter. EU vendors should be GDPR-compliant. US vendors handling healthcare data need HIPAA compliance. Always verify certifications by requesting audit reports, not just certificates.
Use multi-layered protection: (1) NDAs with liquidated damages enforceable in your jurisdiction, (2) access controls limiting code exposure to specific engineers, (3) data residency requirements (code stays in EU/US data centers), (4) audit rights for unannounced facility inspections, (5) employee background checks and exit procedures, (6) encrypted communication channels and VPN-only access. Choose vendors in countries with strong IP laws and treaty relationships with your home country.
Aim for at least 4 hours of daily overlap between your core hours and the vendor’s working hours. This allows real-time standup meetings, urgent bug discussions, and quick clarifications. Less than 4 hours forces purely async communication, which slows iteration cycles. Nearshore vendors (1-3 hour difference) enable near-real-time collaboration. Distant offshore vendors (8-12 hour difference) require disciplined async workflows with detailed documentation and video updates.
EU vendors offer better timezone alignment (6-9 hour overlap with US East Coast, full overlap with EU), stronger IP protection under EU law, GDPR-compliant data handling, lower geopolitical risk, and cultural/legal alignment. While Asian offshore vendors offer slightly lower rates, the coordination overhead, IP risks, and compliance complexity often offset the cost savings. EU nearshore balances cost efficiency (40-60% savings) with lower risk.
Need EU-based software testing?
BetterQA is an ISO 27001-certified testing company based in Romania (EU/NATO member). We work with US and EU clients who need GDPR-compliant testing with nearshore reliability.
Get in touch
