Vibe coding ships 10x faster. You also get 10x the bugs. We built the future of QA for exactly this.
Your team writes code in hours now. We test it at the same pace: our own QA tools run agentic test pipelines, and 50+ QA engineers who test independently of your developers check every finding.
ISO 27001 certifiedReviewed on ClutchClients in 20+ countriesSince 2018
What are you building?
Pick your industry and see the same release handled two ways. The scenarios are illustrative examples, not client data.
You ship a new payout flow, written with a coding agent's help.
What keeps you up at night
- 01"A payout bug moves real money to the wrong account."
- 02"The regulator asks for test evidence we don't have."
- 03"A breach costs us the licence, not just the customers."
What you get
- 01Every path money takes is tested on every release, before it ships.
- 02A release report your regulator and auditors can read, generated with each build.
- 03Security tested in the same pass, not next quarter.
| With a typical QA setup | With BetterQA |
|---|---|
| Tested when a tester gets to it. | Our pipelines test every path the money takes, on each pull request. |
| Security checked next quarter. | The AI Security Toolkit runs in the same pass. |
| A release decision on gut feel. | A release report your regulator and auditors can read. |
Proof. On one fintech platform, a wider second round with our toolkit confirmed 239 security findings, 9 critical, 67 high. We're ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified.
The second round covered more ground, so the toolkit isn't the whole jump. Client name withheld.
Financial services testingA feature touching patient data is ready to ship.
What keeps you up at night
- 01"A bug reaches a patient."
- 02"We fail the audit because requirements and tests don't line up."
- 03"Validation paperwork slows every release."
What you get
- 01Testers who never sign off code they wrote, checking every change.
- 02Every requirement traced to the tests that cover it (ISO 13485 certified team).
- 03Audit evidence produced with every build, not assembled by hand.
| With a typical QA setup | With BetterQA |
|---|---|
| Requirements and tests in separate spreadsheets. | Every requirement traced to the tests that cover it, in BugBoard. |
| Bugs described in an email thread. | Each bug filed with steps and test cases, linked to its ticket. |
| Evidence assembled by hand before the audit. | A release report generated with every build. |
Proof. We're ISO 13485 certified, the quality standard for medical devices. Clients include AdviNow Medical, CardiaSync and Owlet. Our founder started as the first QA engineer on a hospital platform.
40 pull requests from coding agents land on Friday afternoon.
What keeps you up at night
- 01"A release breaks something customers use every day, and they churn."
- 02"Code from our coding agents ships faster than we can test it."
- 03"Regression takes days for one small change."
What you get
- 01Every pull request tested before your users see it.
- 02Testing that keeps pace with your release speed, without hiring a QA team first.
- 03Automated regression where Flows proposes each selector fix and an engineer approves it.
| With a typical QA setup | With BetterQA |
|---|---|
| Someone starts testing on Monday. | Our pipelines ran on every pull request over the weekend. |
| Scripts break when the UI changes. | Flows proposes the fix when selectors change and an engineer approves it. |
| Bugs as screenshots in Slack. | A ticket with steps and test cases, linked to its Jira story. |
Proof. Clients include Vulog, Collaboard and ITI Digital.
Your checkout gets a redesign.
What keeps you up at night
- 01"Checkout breaks on our biggest sales day."
- 02"An accessibility complaint turns into a legal problem."
- 03"A payment or shipping integration fails silently."
What you get
- 01Your checkout journeys tested end to end before every release.
- 02Accessibility checked across whole journeys, so you're ready for the European Accessibility Act (in force since June 2025).
- 03Integrations tested as part of the journey, not on their own.
| With a typical QA setup | With BetterQA |
|---|---|
| Accessibility checked page by page, if at all. | Auditi tests whole journeys and catches the failure that stops a blind shopper halfway through paying. |
| Regression scripts rewritten after the redesign. | Flows proposes the fix when selectors change and an engineer approves it. |
| Found by a customer complaint. | Found before release. |
Proof. The European Accessibility Act has applied since June 2025. Clients include Avilabs, an e-commerce business.
Retail software testingDrop a screenshot of a bug into BugBoard and get a full bug report with test cases in minutes. Free while in early access.
What you just saw, in four lines
We built the tools we fight with.
BugBoard, Flows, Auditi, BetterFlow and the AI Security Toolkit, included in every engagement. On one fintech platform a wider second round with our toolkit confirmed 239 security findings, 9 of them critical.
Engineers who test independently and own the result.
Developers testing their own code are students grading their own exams. We're not a body-rental agency, and we never sign off code we wrote. 50+ engineers in the EU check every finding our pipelines raise.
Leave whenever you like, and take everything.
Your bugs, test history and tests stay with you. Flows tests export to Playwright, Cypress and Selenium.
Prove it on your product first.
A one-month trial, and the first two weeks are complimentary if you are not happy. Public rates from €20 to €45 an hour.
"Now you can do 10 times the number of features, but that also means you have 10 times the number of bugs. QA needs to catch up."
Tudor Brad, founder of BetterQA
Our first round confirmed 38 findings. The second, wider round, run with the AI Security Toolkit, confirmed 239: 9 critical, 67 high. We also found 40 issues outside scope and handed them over free.
Round two covered more ground, so the toolkit isn't the whole jump. Client name withheld.
See our security benchmarkWant the same rigour on your product?
Start a one-month trialQA engineers with tools we built ourselves
We disliked the testing tools on the market, so we built our own. They run as agentic test pipelines, they come with every engagement, and an engineer checks everything they find, because automated tools can be confidently wrong.
Your coding agent writes the feature. Ours tests it.
Our tools run as MCP servers that our engineers drive from coding agents, and we can connect them to yours during an engagement.
AI Security Toolkit
Security testing15 open-source scanners plus 20 checks we wrote, correlated in one pass. How it works
BugBoard
Bugs and test casesA screenshot or video becomes a bug report with test cases in minutes. Every Jira ticket is tied to the tests that cover it, and the release report is one your auditors can read.
bugboard.coFlows
Test automationRecord a journey in the browser. When selectors change, Flows proposes the fix and an engineer approves it. Tests export to Playwright, Cypress and Selenium. How it works
Auditi
AccessibilityFinds the accessibility failures that block a real user halfway through checkout or sign-up.
auditi.roTransparent hours. BetterFlow checks logged hours against real activity, so you pay for work that was done. betterflow.eu
1:00Why choose BetterQA?
We become part of your team and build the processes that prevent defects, instead of only managing them after release.
Four ways to buy QA, and where we differ
| If you choose | What you get there | What BetterQA gives you instead |
|---|---|---|
| A testing platform | Their platform, run by their people or their crowd. | Engineers who own the result. Your bugs, test history and tests stay with you when you leave. |
| A QA boutique | Engineers who pick the market's tools for each project. | Engineers with five QA tools we built ourselves, included in every engagement. |
| An enterprise QA firm | Scale and broad coverage, built for large accounts. | A one-month trial on your product, the first two weeks complimentary if you are not happy, and public rates. |
| A system integrator | QA alongside the code they build. | Independent testing. We never sign off code we wrote. |
Common questions
Is BetterQA an AI testing platform?
No. BetterQA is a team of 50+ QA engineers who build and use their own tools. The pipelines take on the repetitive work at the speed code is now written, and an engineer checks every finding before it reaches you.
We already have QA. Why add you?
Your QA team was sized for the old pace. We plug in beside them with our own tools and engineers, take the surge vibe coding creates, and run rounds they don't have time for, like a full security pass. They keep ownership, and you keep the tests and data.
Why choose BetterQA over a testing platform or a QA agency?
Unlike a testing platform, you get engineers who own the result, and your bugs, test history and tests stay with you. Unlike a staffing agency, our engineers come with five QA tools we built, included in every engagement. Unlike a team testing its own code, we test independently: we never sign off code we wrote.
Can you give us evidence for our regulator?
Yes. BugBoard ties every Jira ticket to the tests that cover it and produces a release report your auditors can read. We're ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO 13485 certified and hold a NATO NCIA Basic Ordering Agreement.
Do we keep the tests?
Yes. Your bugs, test history and tests can be exported when the engagement ends, and Flows tests export to Playwright, Cypress and Selenium.
What does it cost?
€20 to €45 an hour, depending on seniority and specialization. Our tools are included at no licence cost, and the first month is a trial, with the first two weeks complimentary if you are not happy.
Where is BetterQA based?
Cluj-Napoca, Romania, in the EU, working under GDPR.
Start with a one-month trial
The first month is a trial, and the first two weeks are complimentary if you are not happy. By the end of the trial you have the bugs we found in BugBoard, the written tests and a final report. Rates from €20 to €45 an hour after that, with a written proposal within 2 business days of the scoping call.
Founded in 2018 by Tudor and Ana Brad. Tudor (a QA engineer himself) or someone from the team is involved at the start of every project.