Signs your product needs outside QA right now

Desk in low light with headphones, a coffee cup and a magazine naming BetterQA a top software testing company
Funding, a new CTO, falling app reviews, a first QA hire, slipping releases: five moments when product risk jumps, and what to do in the first 30 days.
Back to blog

Signs your product needs outside QA right now

Short answer

Five moments make the risk in a product jump: new funding and a push for growth, a new head of engineering, falling app store reviews, hiring your first tester, and releases that keep slipping or need a hotfix. At each of them, outside QA can start within days, while a hire takes months, so it is usually the faster way to get the risk under control.

Most companies that need testing find out at the worst possible moment: during a launch, after a bad release, or when a large customer complains. The signals usually show up earlier. This guide covers the five we watch for, why each one is risky, and what to do in the first 30 days.

Article details
Question
When does a product need outside testing?
Audience
Founders, CTOs and heads of product
BetterQA team
50+ engineers in Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Clutch rating
4.9 / 5 from 65+ reviews

You just raised money and are about to grow fast

Why it is risky. The plan now depends on many more users arriving soon. A bug that annoyed fifty people will annoy five thousand, and the new users have no reason to forgive it. Investors will also be watching the first months closely.

First 30 days. Test the paths new users take first: signup, onboarding, payment and the main action they came for. Check the product under the load the growth plan expects, not today's.

Outside or hire? Outside first. The growth is happening now, and a hire takes months. A permanent tester can come later, once you know what the team needs.

A new CTO or head of engineering has arrived

Why it is risky. New engineering leaders are often hired with a mandate to fix quality, and they inherit a product nobody has tested independently. They need to know where the problems are before they can promise anything.

First 30 days. Get an independent picture: an audit of the main flows, the open bugs, the test coverage and the release process. It gives the new leader facts to plan from instead of opinions.

Outside or hire? Outside for the assessment, because people who did not build the product see it most clearly. What follows depends on what the assessment finds.

Your app store reviews are dropping

Why it is risky. Reviews that mention crashes or "the update broke" something are public and stay at the top of your page for weeks. Each one costs downloads you never see.

First 30 days. Read the bad reviews as bug reports and reproduce them on real devices and operating system versions. Then put a regression check in front of every release, so the same thing does not break twice.

Outside or hire? Outside usually wins here, because it brings a range of real devices and mobile testing experience that a single new hire does not.

You are hiring your first tester

Why it is risky. Opening the role means you already know quality is a problem. Hiring a good tester can take months, and the problems do not wait for the hire.

First 30 days. Cover the gap with outside testers while you hire, and have them set up the basics: a bug report format, test cases for the main flows and a release checklist. Your new hire then starts with a working process instead of a blank page.

Outside or hire? Both, in sequence. Outside now, your own hire when you find the right person, and outside testers kept on for peaks and specialist work if that helps.

Releases keep slipping, or every release needs a hotfix

Why it is risky. This is the clearest sign that testing happens too late. Bugs are found after the release instead of before it, and every fix pulls developers off the next piece of work.

First 30 days. Move testing earlier: review requirements before work starts, test each feature as it is finished, and agree with the product owner which bugs block a release. Track how many hotfixes each release needs, so you can see the number fall.

Outside or hire? Outside is usually faster to fix the process, because it brings a working method on day one. Our guide on adding outside testers to your team covers how that fits into your sprints.

Pay attention to the signals early

The companies that need QA rarely decide to get it on a calm day. They find out during a launch, in a run of one-star reviews, or when a customer escalates. Each of the five signs above usually shows up weeks before that moment. If you recognise one, the cheapest time to act is now.

Frequently asked questions

When the risk jumps faster than you can hire: after funding, when a new engineering leader arrives, when reviews start to drop, while you hire your first tester, or when releases keep needing hotfixes.
Hire when the need is permanent and stable and you can wait months to fill the role. Use an outside team when you need help now, need skills you do not have, or need capacity for a peak. Many companies do both.
Usually within days of the paperwork, starting on the flow that matters most. Our checklist of what a new QA team needs in week one covers what to prepare.

Recognise one of these signs?

Tell us which one. We start on the flow that matters most, inside your process, and you decide what comes next.

Book a call QA outsourcing

Need help with software testing?

BetterQA provides independent QA services across manual testing, automation, security audits, and performance testing. ISO 27001, 9001, 14001 and 13485 certified.

Share the Post: